HUEY
P. NEWTON, THE GREAT CIVIL RIGHT ACTIVIST, FOUNDER OF AFRO=AMERICAN SOCIETY AND
CO=FOUNDER OF THE BLACK PANTHER PARTY
‘My parents taught me to be unafraid of
life and therefore unafraid of death.’
Huey P. Newton (1942-1989) founded the Afro-American Society and was a
co-founder of the Black Panther Party, serving as its minister of defense
during much of the 1960s. Later he turned to community service for the poor.
Huey P. Newton was born February 17, 1942, in Monroe, Louisiana. The youngest
of seven children, Huey was named for former Louisiana governor Huey Pierce
Long. The Newton family moved to Oakland, California, in 1945 to take advantage
of the job opportunities created by World War II wartime industries.
Huey attended the Oakland public schools where, he claimed, he was made to feel
“uncomfortable and ashamed of being black.” He responded by constantly and
consistently defying authority, which resulted in frequent suspensions. At the
age of 14, he was arrested for gun possession and vandalism. In his
autobiography, Revolutionary Suicide, Newton wrote, “during
those long years in the Oakland public schools, I did not have one teacher who
taught me anything relevant to my own life or experience. Not one instructor
ever awoke in me a desire to learn more or to question or explore the worlds of
literature, science, and history. All they did was try to rob me of the sense
of my own uniqueness and worth, and in the process they nearly killed my urge
to inquire.”
According to Newton, he did not learn to read well until he had finished high
school. “I actually learned to read—really read more than just ‘dog’ and ‘cat,’
which was about all I could do when I left high school—by listening to records
of Vincent Price reading great poetry, and then looking up the poems to see how
the words looked.” In order to prove that high school counselors were wrong in
saying he was not college material, Newton attended Merritt College
intermittently, eventually earning an Associate of Arts degree. He also studied
law at Oakland City College and at San Francisco Law School.
Newton claimed he studied law to become a better burglar. He was arrested
several times for minor offenses while still a teenager and he supported
himself in college by burglarizing homes in the Oakland and Berkeley Hills area
and running the “short change” game. In 1964, at age 22, he was convicted of
assault with a deadly weapon and sentenced to six months in the Alameda County
jail. Newton spent most of this sentence in solitary confinement, including the
“soul breaker”—extreme solitary confinement.
While at Oakland City College, Newton had become politically oriented and
socially conscious. He joined the Afro-American Association and played a role
in getting the first black history course adopted as part of the college’s
curriculum. He read the works of Frantz Fanon, Malcolm X, Chairman Mao
Tse-tung, and Che Guevara. A child of the ghetto and a victim of discrimination
and the “system,” Newton was very much aware of the plight of Oakland’s
African-American community. Realizing that there were few organizations to
speak for or represent lower class African-Americans, Newton along with Bobby Sealeorganized the Black Panther Party for Self Defense in October 1966, with
Seale as chairman and Newton as minister of defense. Like a wary panther that
would not attack unless attacked, so too was the organization regarded.
Cop-haters since childhood, Newton and Seale decided the police must be stopped
from harassing Oakland’s African-Americans; in other words, to “defend the
community against the aggression of the power structure, including the military
and the armed might of the police.” Newton was familiar with the California
penal code and the state’s law regarding weapons and was thus able to convince
a number of African-Americans of their right to bear arms. Members of the Black
Panther Party for Self Defense began patrolling the Oakland police. Guns were
the essential ingredient on these patrols. Newton and other Black Panther
members observed police procedure, ensured that African-American citizens were
not abused, advised African-Americans of their rights, and posted bail for
those arrested. In addition to patrolling the police, Newton and Seale were
responsible for writing the Black Panther Party Platform and
Program, which
called for freedom, full employment, decent housing, education, and military
exemption for African-Americans. But there was a darker side to the group,
described in Former Panther Earl Anthony’s book, Spitting in the Winds
a party created with the goal to organize America for armed revolution. Moreover,
Washington, D.C., intelligence spent many years trying to bring down what they
believed to be “the most violence-prone of all the extremist groups.”
Huey Newton proved to be as violent as the party he helped to create when he
was thrust into the national limelight in October 1967; accused of murdering
Oakland police officer John Frey. In September 1968 Newton was convicted of
voluntary manslaughter and was sentenced to two to 15 years in prison. In May
1970 the California Appellate Court reversed Newton’s conviction and ordered a
new trial. After two more trials the State of California dropped its case
against Newton, citing technicalities including the judge’s failure to relay
proper instructions to the jury.
After his release from prison Newton overhauled the Black Panther Party,
revised its program, and changed its rhetoric. While he had been imprisoned,
party membership had decreased significantly in several cities, and the FBI had
started a campaign to disrupt and eventually bring down the Black Panthers.
Abandoning its Marxist-Leninist ideology, Newton now concentrated on community
survival programs. The Black Panthers sponsored a free breakfast program for
children, sickle-cell anemia tests, free food and shoes, and a school, the
Samuel Napier Intercommunal Youth Institute. However, as before, the Black
Panthers were not without controversy. Funding for several of their programs
were raised as the result of the co-operation of drug dealers and prostitution
rings.
Newton tried to shed his image as a firebreathing revolutionary, but he
continued to have difficulty with the police. In 1974 several assault charges
were filed against him, and he was also accused of murdering a 17-year-old
prostitute, Kathleen Smith. Newton failed to make his court appearance. His
bail was revoked, a bench warrant issued, and his name added to the Federal
Bureau of Investigation’s most wanted list. Newton had jumped bail and escaped
to Cuba, where he spent three years in exile. In Cuba he worked as a machinist
and teacher. He returned home in 1977 to face murder charges because, he said,
the climate in the United States had changed and he believed he could get a
fair trial. He was acquitted of the murder of Kathleen Smith after two juries
were deadlocked.
In addition to organizing the Black Panther Party and serving as its minister
of defense, Newton unsuccessfully ran for Congress as a candidate of the Peace
and Freedom Party in 1968. In 1971, between his second and third trials for the
murder of John Frey, he visited China for ten days, where he met with Premier
Chou En-lai and Chiang Ch’ing, the wife of Chairman Mao Tse-tung. While there
he was offered political asylum.
Newton studied for a Ph.D. in the history of
social consciousness at the University of California in 1978. In 1985 the
43-year-old Newton was arrested for embezzling state and federal funds from the
Black Panthers’ community education and nutrition programs. In 1989 he was
convicted of embezzling funds from a school run by the Black Panthers,
supposedly to support his alcohol and drug addictions. By this time the
Panthers had turned to less violent activism. On August 22, 1989, Huey Newton
was shot dead in Oakland, supposedly over a drug dispute. ironically in the
same city streets of Oakland that saw the rise of the Black Panthers 23 years
ago
Source: : http://www.africawithin.com/bios/huey_newton.htm
The young and radical Huey!
As a great inspirational leader of
his time,Huey Newton co-founder of the Black Panther Partytook opportunity to address the contentious
issue of Gay Rights. In August 15 1970he gave this speech:
"
During the past few years strong movements have developed among women and among
homosexuals seeking their liberation. There has been some uncertainty about how
to relate to these movements.
Whatever your personal opinions and your
insecurities about homosexuality and the various liberation movements among
homosexuals and women (and I speak of the homosexuals and women as oppressed
groups), we should try to unite with them in a revolutionary fashion.
I say ”whatever your insecurities are”
because as we very well know, sometimes our first instinct is to want to hit a
homosexual in the mouth, and want a woman to be quiet. We want to hit a
homosexual in the mouth because we are afraid that we might be homosexual; and
we want to hit the women or shut her up because we are afraid that she might
castrate us, or take the nuts that we might not have to start with.
We must gain security in ourselves and
therefore have respect and feelings for all oppressed people. We must not use
the racist attitude that the white racists use against our people because they
are Black and poor. Many times the poorest white person is the most racist
because he is afraid that he might lose something, or discover something that
he does not have. So you’re some kind of a threat to him. This kind of
psychology is in operation when we view oppressed people and we are angry with
them because of their particular kind of behavior, or their particular kind of
deviation from the established norm.
Remember, we have not established a
revolutionary value system; we are only in the process of establishing it. I do
not remember our ever constituting any value that said that a revolutionary
must say offensive things towards homosexuals, or that a revolutionary should
make sure that women do not speak out about their own particular kind of
oppression. As a matter of fact, it is just the opposite: we say that we
recognize the women’s right to be free. We have not said much about the
homosexual at all, but we must relate to the homosexual movement because it is
a real thing. And I know through reading, and through my life experience and
observations that homosexuals are not given freedom and liberty by anyone in
the society. They might be the most oppressed people in the society.
And what made them homosexual? Perhaps
it’s a phenomenon that I don’t understand entirely. Some people say that it is
the decadence of capitalism. I don’t know if that is the case; I rather doubt
it. But whatever the case is, we know that homosexuality is a fact that exists,
and we must understand it in its purest form: that is, a person should have the
freedom to use his body in whatever way he wants.
That is not endorsing things in
homosexuality that we wouldn’t view as revolutionary. But there is nothing to
say that a homosexual cannot also be a revolutionary. And maybe I’m now
injecting some of my prejudice by saying that “even a homosexual can be a
revolutionary.” Quite the contrary, maybe a homosexual could be the most
revolutionary.
When we have revolutionary conferences,
rallies, and demonstrations, there should be full participation of the gay
liberation movement and the women’s liberation movement. Some groups might be
more revolutionary than others. We should not use the actions of a few to say that
they are all reactionary or counter-revolutionary, because they are not.
We should deal with the factions just as
we deal with any other group or party that claims to be revolutionary. We
should try to judge, somehow, whether they are operating in a sincere
revolutionary fashion and from a really oppressed situation. (And we will grant
that if they are women they are probably oppressed.) If they do things that are
unrevolutionary or counter-revolutionary, then criticize that action.
If we feel that the group in spirit means
to be revolutionary in practice, but they make mistakes in interpretation of
the revolutionary philosophy, or they do not understand the dialectics of the
social forces in operation, we should criticize that and not criticize them because
they are women trying to be free. And the same is true for homosexuals. We
should never say a whole movement is dishonest when in fact they are trying to
be honest. They are just making honest mistakes. Friends are allowed to make
mistakes. The enemy is not allowed to make mistakes because his whole existence
is a mistake, and we suffer from it. But the women’s liberation front and gay
liberation front are our friends, they are our potential allies, and we need as
many allies as possible.
We should be willing to discuss the
insecurities that many people have about homosexuality. When I say
“insecurities,” I mean the fear that they are some kind of threat to our
manhood. I can understand this fear. Because of the long conditioning process
which builds insecurity in the American male, homosexuality might produce
certain hang-ups in us. I have hang-ups myself about male homosexuality. But on
the other hand, I have no hang-up about female homosexuality. And that is a
phenomenon in itself. I think it is probably because male homosexuality is a
threat to me and female homosexuality is not.
We should be careful about using those
terms that might turn our friends off. The terms “faggot” and “punk” should be
deleted from our vocabulary, and especially we should not attach names normally
designed for homosexuals to men who are enemies of the people, such as
[Richard] Nixon or [John] Mitchell. Homosexuals are not enemies of the people.
We should try to form a working coalition
with the gay liberation and women’s liberation groups. We must always handle
social forces in the most appropriate manner.”
Source: hiphopandpolitics.wordpress.com
As a radical revolutionary civil right activist, Huey was also a crowd puller
as his clenching fist was always adored by his admirers.
Huey P. Newton, national defense minister
of the Black Panther Party, raises his clenched fist behind the podium as he
speaks at a convention sponsored by the Black Panthers at Temple University’s
McGonigle Hall in Philadelphia, Pa., Saturday, Sept. 5, 1970. He is surrounded
by security guards of the movement. The audience gathered is estimated at 6,000
with another thousand outside the crowded hall. (AP Photo)
Here is a video of William Buckley
interview with the iconic revolutionary activist on Filing line. It shows that
the intellectual hardcore Huey was a shy person.
Newton, right, with Black Panther Party
co-founder Bobby
In possibly more ways than not, Newton saw
the gun as a vehicle for rhetoric rather than a vehicle for violence. It was
supposed to get people looking and thinking. Despite his insistence that
violent armed struggle would be necessary for a revolution, as well as his own
conflicts with violence, in truth Newton had hoped that the gun itself would be
enough to force the oppressors back, not the actions of the gun. Violence was
only necessary when in self-defense, not in aggression. Many Americans both
within and at large had trouble understanding the true meaning of armed
self-defense and the gun was seen and used as a means of violence, not as
symbol for empowerment and self-determination. (http://socialjustice.ccnmtl.columbia.edu/index.php/Huey_P._Newton_::_Philosophy_::_Armed_Self-Defense)
To
Huey Newton when it comes to the issue of fighting for the freedom of the black
people, he was never a "Pacifist." He is one great leader if one
likes his him or not, the world ought to pay tribute to him for his brave and
selfless fight for racial equality.
No comments:
Post a Comment